For starters: So fraught with stress were the ideas of a film that could bring justice to the mainstream Hollywood stereotype. Let’s not confuse this film with one that does: “Worlds Greatest Dad”.
For main course: We shall re establish where this film went almightily wrong whilst comparing it with films of its reverse (which are too many to speak of here so we shall only have one) such as “Man On Fire”. “Man On Fire” is your standard action film with the slightly more artistic edge that one does not expect from such, but I am afraid this isn’t the subject; I believe someone saw “Man On Fire” and thought of a great camera direction for a film of their own: “It’s realism! It’s what makes this film really real!” well… it’s not like this in the slightest, as this is a romantic comedy with a script for the reading age of a three year old.
For desert: On the other hand it is nice that Hollywood has made this effort to deepen their artistic plagiarism and actually show the public in the most ‘realistic techniques’: how shit is done with money’.
Conclude: Good times for some.